Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:55

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Wall Street CEOs are cycling through the five stages of tariff grief - NPR
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Are You Mean When You're Overstimulated? There's Actually A Reason For That. - HuffPost
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Raw recap & reactions: Royal chaos - Cageside Seats
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Want $8,665 A Year In Passive Income, Invest $25,000 In These High Yield Stocks - 24/7 Wall St.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Is Max Verstappen unstoppable this season?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Brain’s Reward Center Tracks Not Just What, But When Rewards Arrive - Neuroscience News